Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Survival of the Fattest? The Obesity Paradox

>> Monday, February 18, 2013








We know from population studies that obesity is a risk factor for the development of a long list of medical problems, including heart disease.  Interestingly, a number of research studies suggest that obesity actually has a protective effect in patients who already have established heart disease, and a recent study shows that this protective effect includes patients with type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

The study by Doehner and colleagues, which is an analysis of data from the PROactive trial (a study of a diabetes medication called pioglitazone, vs placebo), they found that over a follow up period of almost 3 years, patients with type 2 diabetes and heart disease had the lowest mortality rates if their body mass index (BMI) at the start of the study was between 30-35.  (A BMI of 30 or greater is considered as 'obese'. You can calculate your own BMI in the right hand column of www.drsue.ca .)

They also found that weight loss was a predictor of mortality, and that weight gain was NOT associated with increased death rates.  In patients taking pioglitazone, a medication that is known to cause weight gain, those who did gain weight on pioglitazone had improved survival compared to those who did not gain weight.

This phenomenon, which has also been shown in several studies of nondiabetics, is what we refer to as the Obesity Paradox - that people with cardiovascular disease seem to be protected by higher body weights.  How is this possible?

The theory is that people who are sick are often losing weight, because they have lost their energy or appetite to eat, or because their illness causes such a high calorie burn that they can't keep up with food intake (this is seen in cancer patients as well).  Thus, the people who gained weight or didn't lose weight in the study were likely more 'well' in general, whereas the people who were thin or losing weight were likely to be sicker with their heart disease, and therefore had a higher rate of death during the study period.   Perhaps it could also be a better 'starting point' to have extra fat tissue on board before a person becomes sick - thereby giving that person more energy stores to draw from while overcoming a period of illness.

All in all, this information reminds us that fat tissue isn't all bad - it actually evolved over millions of years to help us survive periods of famine, and probably periods of illness as well.

Dr Sue Pedersen www.drsue.ca © 2013 

Follow me on Twitter for daily tips! @drsuepedersen

Read more...

How Many Calories Are Burned During Sex? (and other mythbusting)

>> Saturday, February 9, 2013







Anyone out there of the opinion that minutes logged getting busy in
the sack count towards the day's cardio workout? Sorry for the bad
news, but - think again.

The New England Journal of Medicine has just published a very
interesting read about the myths, presumptions, and facts about
obesity. Amongst the myths is one about sex: while lore has it
that 200-300 calories are burned during sex, the average (6 minute)
romp in the hay for a 70kg man only burns about 21 calories (based on
3 METs, a metabolic equivalent of energy output). As the article
points out, watching TV for the same 6 minutes burns about 7 calories,
so the net burn is actually only 14 calories.

Now that I've got your attention - the other myths in the article are
definitely worth a read and are equally 'hot' topics of discussion!

Dr Sue Pedersen www.drsue.ca © 2013 

Follow me on Twitter for daily tips! @drsuepedersen

Read more...

DrSue.ca Product Review - AspireAssist Stomach Drain for Weight Control

>> Monday, February 4, 2013





                                                                                                     aspirebariatrics.com



'Eat what you want and lose weight' - this is how I've seen this product reviewed on various online websites.

It's called the AspireAssist - it's a tube implanted in the stomach, with a port leading to the outside of the abdomen through the skin in your belly.  It basically acts like a tap - twenty minutes after you eat, you go to the bathroom, turn the tap on, and it drains about a third of what you've eaten directly into the toilet.     Ironically, it's a similar set up to the PEG tube, which is a tube that has been use for a long time to FEED patients who can't take in enough food by mouth (the direction of flow in the tube, of course, is in reverse).

Clinical trials have been done showing successful weight loss, and it has been approved for use in Europe.

My take on this:  I'm concerned for the following reasons:

1.  The most important part of treating obesity well is to deal with the underlying root causes of the weight struggle.  Are you an emotional eater or stress eater?  Is there limited access to physical activity in your life?  Are you sleeping enough?  Although lifestyle counseling is mentioned on the device's website,  these concerns need to be central to any weight loss plan.

2.  I am worried that the message that this device will convey is that it's ok to just continue eating for the same unhealthy reasons or in the same unhealthy pattern - just turn the tap on afterward to drain it out - which is clearly NOT an OK message to convey.

3.  I'm concerned that the device could become an enabler of unhealthy eating patterns.   Some web reviews have suggested that this is, or could induce, a form of bulimia - I agree that this is a danger as well.

You might ask, how is this different from currently available obesity surgeries? (you can read more about these here).  The main difference is that by decreasing the size of the stomach, the current surgeries do teach about lifestyle change, markedly decreasing the amount of food that can be consumed.  Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy also alter hormone levels that help to decrease hunger, whereas the AspireAssist and the gastric band do not.  That being said, addressing the root causes of the weight struggle are crucial to the success of any type of bariatric surgery.

BOTTOM LINE:  Draining the food you eat back out of your stomach doesn't count as a positive lifestyle change!

Dr Sue Pedersen www.drsue.ca © 2013 

Read more...

  © Blogger templates Palm by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP